NCAA
NCAA

Is March Madness destined to disappear? A former ESPN executive delivers bold reason behind this idea

People have mixed opinions about this

The March Madness logo adorns a court.
The March Madness logo adorns a court.LAPRESSE

Veteran sports executive and co-founder of Meadowlark Media, John Skipper, has proposed a bold and controversial vision for the future of college basketball's iconic March Madness tournament. Known for his accurate predictions in sports media-such as the WNBA's skyrocketing broadcasting rights revenue and Netflix's expansion into live sports, Skipper now envisions a dramatic shift in the structure of the NCAA Tournament.

Speaking on the podcast Pablo Torre Finds Out, the former executive chairman of DAZN Group and former president of ESPN, suggested that college basketball could follow college football's lead by consolidating power into four super conferences. Under his vision, these conferences, consisting of 64 teams, would create their own governing body and operate independently from the NCAA. This new tournament model, Skipper argued, could potentially generate $1.5 billion in revenue, further enriching the most prominent programs and their conferences.

Madness! Alabama State stuns with a last-second buzzer-beater as March Madness chaos has begun!

"Colleges, athletic departments, college presidents have demonstrated that to get more money, they will do pretty much anything," Skipper remarked, highlighting the financial motivations behind such a restructuring. He pointed to the SEC and Big Ten's efforts to secure guaranteed slots in the College Football Playoff as a precursor to this consolidation of power.

The impact that this would generate

The proposal, however, has sparked significant debate. Critics, including sports executive David Samson, argue that Skipper's vision would strip away the magic of March Madness, particularly the charm of underdog stories. "Upset alert is a foundational concept of the tournament," Samson said, referencing the excitement generated when smaller, lesser-known schools challenge and defeat powerhouses.

Skipper, however, dismissed the loss of traditional upsets, suggesting that the new model would still allow for drama and surprises, albeit among more high-profile teams. "When the 15 seed from the SEC upsets the number three seed from the Big Ten, that's an upset alert," Skipper contended.

While the concept of a 64-team super-conference tournament could bring in unprecedented revenue, it also raises concerns about the increasing marginalization of smaller schools and the erosion of March Madness' egalitarian spirit. For now, the idea remains speculative, but Skipper's vision underscores the broader conversation about the future of collegiate athletics and the ongoing tension between tradition and financial growth.

NCAAMarch Madness officially begins with insane game-winning play in first game
NCAAAnother March Madness collapse: Texas in for a hard immediate shake up
NCAAHow to watch March Madness 2025: TV channels and streaming guide for the tournaments